We are beginning a new journey with JAID in 2020.  Look for special issues in universal design and other topics during the year.  If you have ideas for a special issue you would like to propose, email Julie Bridges bridgeja@evms.edu 

I thank all the wonderful volunteers who work for JAID and wish you all a happy new year!

Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019

 


 

 

Table of Contents

Click on title to view article .pdf

 

Welcome!

   Julie Bridges, Editor

 

Weaving a Localized Context of use: What it Means for Instructional Design
 

   John Baaki

   Monica W. Tracey

 

Abstract:  The purpose of our manuscript is to probe what a localized context of use means for instructional design practice and of environments in which learning occurs. A localized context of use emphasizes specific moments of use where context is scaled back to what is needed in a situation or moment. We begin by looking at the evolution of context of de-sign. We review context in instructional design since Tessmer and Richey’s (1997) contextual approach to instruction. We then present our localized context of use through the actions of a learner and a designer, provide applications for practice, and implications for further research.

 

Keywords: context; localized context of use; empathic design; empathy; instructional design practice

Advancing the Curriculum: Logical Programming for Graphic Designers
 

   Robert Fraher

   Alex DeArmond

 

Abstract:  In a move toward evidenced-based curriculum development, this paper describes an action research project that investigated logical programming as a new competency for an undergraduate program in Graphic Design and Interactive Media (GDIM). The paper explains the context of the investigation and the technology involved, and outlines a study conducted to better understand students’ knowledge development, perceived value of this knowledge, and opinions of the learning activities involved. The paper concludes by illustrating how the study helped guide the integration of a logical programming class into the GDIM program, and discussing key takeaways for design educators from other disciplines.

 

Keywords: Logical programming, design education, evidence-based, action research, interactive

Gamification to Enhance Learner Self-Efficacy: An Instructional Design Theory

   Stacey Zurek

   Marcella Niehoff

 

Abstract:  The author’s own reflections on the value of gamification in education and her experience tackling the design of gamified learning stirred a desire to establish a more prescriptive method of constructing gamified learning environ-ments. Moreover, research supports the author’s contention that guidance is necessary for the effective design of gamified instruction (Dichev & Dicheva, 2017; Hamari, Koivisto, & Sarsa, 2014; Landers, 2014; Lee & Hammer, 2011). According to Dichev and Dicheva (2017), “the process of integrating game design principles within varying educational experi-ences appears challenging and there are currently no practical guidelines for how to do so in a coherent and efficient
manner.” (p. 25) The Gamification for Enhancing Learner Self-Efficacy (GELSE) instructional design theory offers a methodology to instructional designers in response to this need for more guidance in the design of gamification. The theory proposes explicit methods for the design of gamified instruction specifically tailored to impact learner self-efficacy. In so doing, the GELSE theory also attends to the criticality of self-efficacy in 21st century learners.

 

Keywords: gamification; gamified learning; self-efficacy; design; instructional design; instructional design theory, theory

How I Became a Yes-Man

   Tim Quiram

 

Letter to the Editor:  About the author: Tim Quiram is the deputy director for Coast Guard training. He lives and works in DC and is part of the Force Readiness Command, headquartered in Norfolk, Va. Tim is a certified performance technolo-gist (https://www.ispi.org) , frequent presenter at professional conferences, and was the architect and a co-author of the widely read study titled “Where the Performance Issues Are and Are Not: A Meta‐Analytic Examination” first published: 07 April 2016 https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21213

 

ISSUES

 

2020 (Volume 9)

2019 (Volume 8)

2018 (Volume 7)

2017 (Volume 6)

2015 (Volume 5)

2014 (Volume 4)

2013 (Volume 3)

2012 (Volume 2)

2011 (Volume 1)

© 2016 by AECT